Category Archives: Film Critic

U2 3D

I went to see the new U2 3D movie at The Bob Bullock Texas State History Museum. It’s not a traditional movie with a storyline and a plot; but full songs from a concert (in Buenos Aires) recorded in 3d IMAX glory. The sound is fantastic and way louder than your average movie, and the visuals are amazing. The music you already know it.

I recommend you check this one out, if only for the audio/visual experience. To my surprise, even my mom liked it, and she hates “loud music with drums“.

Paradise Now (review)

I finally saw the controversial movie Paradise Now. I even wrote a lengthy (unfinished) post about it. However, due to the highly explosive (pun intended? I can’t help myself!) topic, the review needs to be very carefully written and that’s a lot of work. So I won’t finish it. I’ll summarize it though:

It’s a good movie. It’s very well done. It’s well acted. It’s entertaining and it’s educational. It is also very careful about what it shows and what it leaves out. This is not a documentary, so it’s unfair to expect a balanced viewpoint. In reality, this movie is by design anything but balanced (and that’s completely valid): It shows the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as seen from the eyes of two young guys from Nablus that get recruited to carry out a suicide bombing in Tel-Aviv. As such, the movie depicts an important part of the whole picture. But only a part.

What worries me (as seen through the ancient all encompasing prism) about this is that a lot of viewers don’t really know enough about the topic and will draw conclusions based on this incomplete picture. Even more worrisome is that many of the viewers that tend to watch this type of films, international artsy non-Hollywood foreign films, love to feel wise and knowledgeable even when they aren’t; so they are extra quick to form their own, strong, final, knowledgeable-sounding conclusions. And they’ll be happy to spread them, you know, in order to feel wise and knowledgeable.

As a side note, the tagline used in the poster is “From the most unexpected place, comes a bold call for peace.“. It makes no sense to me how it relates to the movie. Can someone explain that?

What do you think?

The MKX® Movie Review: Spider-Man 3

As my faithful readers know, I’ve been something of a Spider-Man fan since I was two or three. I used to watch the cartoons (from the 60’s and from the 90’s) and I read the comic books for many years. I saw the previous two movies at midnight when they opened and did the same for the third one. (I must clarify that none of this makes me a nerd, and if you think it does… well you’re racist or something). So here’s my take, in an easy-to-write Good/Bad/Ugly format.
Good

  • Venom looks incredible, just like I pictured him when reading the comic books. Too cool. Topher Grace did a great job as Eddie Brock (which I didn’t expect).
  • The Sandman is awesome too. Thomas Haden Church looked great.
  • Gwen Stacy is hot. Hotter than Mary Jane.
  • Lots of action, tons of things going on.

Bad

  • The whole Symbiont thing is way under explained.
  • A meteor crash? In Central Park? Next to Peter Parker? And he doesn’t notice? Give me a f****** break!
  • No Spider-Sense in the whole movie! At all! They always catch Spider-Man by surprise! Sure, everybody knows Venom does not trigger the Spider-Sense, but the Sandman and the Goblin should…
  • So now Sandman killed Uncle Ben? Who’s going to be the killer next? J. J. Jameson?
  • Most characters are under-developed.
  • Venom is not schizophrenic. He refers to himself as “I”, not as “we”. That’s just wrong.
  • Cool and well done as the character is, I think the movie didn’t really need the Sandman. He doesn’t get enough time and whatever little time he gets he’s just taking away from the others.

Ugly

  • Eddie Brock was played by a different actor in the first movie. No one seems to remember him.
  • Green-Goblin Jr. is lame.
  • Too many scenes that belong in a chick-flick.
  • Why does the evil Peter Parker like to dance so much? Couldn’t he just do evil things instead?
  • Venom has no tongue. The big tongue with the green slime is one of the coolest thing about Venom.

Conclusion: Not as good as the previous two movies, but it’s fun to watch. Go see it.

Iron-Man

I was never a huge fan of Iron Man. In my list he’s in the same level as the X-Men, a little above Hulk, below Batman and nowhere close to Superman and Spider-Man (of course we all make these lists – hell I’ll make it a poll).
However, they’re making a movie and it’s looking pretty cool. First, they have Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark. Second, this is what the suit is going to look like:
Yeah, pretty sweet. Looks like they didn’t screw this one up (unlike the thong-wearing, S-buckled metro-sexual Superman in Superman Returns – yuck).
I think I’ll be seeing the trailer in 7 hours and 32 minutes, at midnight’s Spider-Man 3 opening (to which I’m not only going but dragging ten or so people along under the pretense that it’s my birthday).
[Update 5/4/2007] Never mind, there was no Iron-Man trailer. Neither a Fantastic 4 one… but they had a really cool Silver-Surfer display at the movie theater.

Underdog – The movie

I kid you not.
The super-powered dog (a.k.a. Supercan in Mexico) from the beloved (by me) sixties cartoon is coming to the movie theater in a live action film. Jason Lee is doing the voice (good choice). I wonder who’s going to play Polly Purebread Top Reporter.
Here are some photos:



For the very few who don’t remember Underdog… watch him: